Introduction

Isolation levels define how transactions interact with each other in a database. The goal is to balance consistency, performance, and concurrency. SQL databases provide four standard isolation levels:

1. Read Uncommitted
2. Read Committed
3. Repeatable Read
4. Serializable

Each level addresses different types of concurrency problems, such as dirty reads, non-repeatable reads, and phantom reads.

1. Read Uncommitted (Lowest Isolation Level)

Definition:

At this level, transactions can read uncommitted changes made by other transactions. This can lead to dirty reads, where one transaction can see changes made by another transaction even if they have not yet been committed. This means data may be inconsistent and might be rolled back later, leading to unpredictable results.

The Read Uncommitted isolation level allows for the highest level of concurrency, as transactions do not have to wait for locks to be released. However, this comes at the cost of data integrity, making it the least safe isolation level. It is generally not recommended for most real-world applications.

Example:

Transaction 1 updates a record but does not commit:

BEGIN TRANSACTION;
UPDATE accounts SET balance = 500 WHERE id = 1;
-- Transaction not committed yet

Meanwhile, Transaction 2 reads the same record:

SELECT balance FROM accounts WHERE id = 1;
-- Returns balance as 500 (uncommitted data)

If Transaction 1 rolls back, Transaction 2 has read invalid data (dirty read).

Issues:

• Dirty Reads: Reading uncommitted data that might be rolled back.
• Inconsistent Data: Data might change unpredictably.

Use Case:

• Rarely used in practice.
• Suitable for read-heavy operations where consistency is not critical.

2. Read Committed (Default in Most Databases)

Definition:

A transaction can only read committed data. Uncommitted changes remain invisible to other transactions. This prevents dirty reads but does not prevent non-repeatable reads, meaning that if a transaction reads the same record twice, the value might have changed due to another committed transaction in between.

The Read Committed isolation level ensures that all reads return committed data, making it a commonly used isolation level. However, because it does not prevent non-repeatable reads, it can still lead to inconsistencies in scenarios where multiple reads of the same data occur within a transaction.

Example:

Transaction 1 updates a record but does not commit:

BEGIN TRANSACTION;
UPDATE accounts SET balance = 500 WHERE id = 1;
-- Transaction not committed yet

Transaction 2 tries to read the same record:

SELECT balance FROM accounts WHERE id = 1;
-- Returns old balance, as update is uncommitted

Once Transaction 1 commits, new transactions see the change.

Issues:

• No Dirty Reads: Prevents reading uncommitted data.
• Non-Repeatable Reads Possible: A value read in one query may change in a subsequent query.

Use Case:

• Default level in databases like Oracle, PostgreSQL, SQL Server.
• Good balance between consistency and performance.

3. Repeatable Read

Definition:

The Repeatable Read isolation level ensures that if a transaction reads the same record multiple times, it always gets the same result, even if other transactions commit changes to that record in between. This prevents non-repeatable reads but does not prevent phantom reads, where new rows inserted by other transactions might still be visible.

This level is particularly useful when ensuring a consistent view of data throughout the transaction is necessary. It is commonly used in banking and financial applications where the same record needs to remain unchanged for the duration of a transaction.

Example:

Transaction 1 reads a balance:

BEGIN TRANSACTION;
SELECT balance FROM accounts WHERE id = 1;
-- Returns 1000

Meanwhile, Transaction 2 updates and commits the balance:

UPDATE accounts SET balance = 500 WHERE id = 1;
COMMIT;

If Transaction 1 reads again:

SELECT balance FROM accounts WHERE id = 1;
-- Still returns 1000 (original value)

Even though another transaction committed a change, Transaction 1 sees a consistent snapshot.

Issues:

• No Dirty Reads
• No Non-Repeatable Reads
• Phantom Reads Possible: A new row inserted by another transaction might still be visible.

Use Case:

• Used in MySQL InnoDB.
• Suitable for financial applications requiring consistent reads.

4. Serializable (Highest Isolation Level)

Definition:

The Serializable isolation level is the strictest level, ensuring complete isolation by making transactions execute in a way that they appear sequential. It prevents dirty reads, non-repeatable reads, and phantom reads, ensuring that transactions behave as if they were executed one after the other rather than concurrently.

This is typically implemented by locking entire tables or using multi-version concurrency control (MVCC), which significantly reduces performance in highly concurrent environments. However, it provides the highest level of consistency and is ideal for cases where data integrity is of utmost importance.

Example:

Transaction 1 selects records:

BEGIN TRANSACTION;
SELECT * FROM accounts WHERE balance > 1000;

Meanwhile, Transaction 2 tries to insert a new account with balance 1500:

INSERT INTO accounts (id, balance) VALUES (3, 1500);
-- This transaction is blocked until Transaction 1 completes

Transaction 2 must wait for Transaction 1 to finish before proceeding.

Issues:

• No Dirty Reads, No Non-Repeatable Reads, No Phantom Reads
• Performance Overhead: High due to reduced concurrency.
• Deadlocks Possible: Transactions may block each other.

Use Case:

• Critical applications needing full isolation.
• Used in PostgreSQL (by default) and financial transactions.

Conclusion

Isolation levels play a crucial role in database transactions. Choosing the right level depends on the need for consistency versus performance. Understanding these concepts helps in designing robust applications that handle concurrency effectively.

---